Alcohol is no respecter of persons or status. In this story, the murderer was a child actor. Dig deeper and you will see a dad who was a drug dealer and a mother who abandoned him. This is a case where the probability of heavy prenatal exposure to alcohol is so high, the case could be made the probability is fact. His actions are those of a FASD brain. Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder does not end when a child reaches the age of 18 or when he or she drops out of school. FASD is lifetime brain damage, played out in courts daily across the nation.
SANTA ANA, Calif. — A jury on Thursday recommended death for a man convicted of murdering a couple by binding them to the anchor of their yacht and throwing them into to ocean off the California coast as they pleaded for their lives.
Skylar Deleon, 29, sat motionless as the jury announced its decision following nearly two days of deliberation in Orange County Superior Court.
Click here for photos.
"He was disappointed," Deleon's attorney Gary Pohlson said afterward. "He was very hopeful he wouldn't get the death penalty."
Deleon was convicted last month of three counts of first-degree murder for the 2003 slaying of Jon Jarvi, who he met in a work furlough program while serving time for burglary, and the 2004 slayings of Tom and Jackie Hawks aboard their yacht.
During the trial's penalty phase, which took six days, jurors heard statements from victims' relatives, attorneys, Deleon's family members and psychiatrists, who offered differing takes on the role child abuse has on a person's development.
Pohlson had pleaded with jurors to help spare his client's life, arguing Deleon was abused by a drug dealing father and abandoned by his mother, leaving him predisposed to violence.
Tom Hawks' son Ryan said he was pleased with the jury's recommendation.
"Skylar is going to be sitting in that jail cell, socializing with his pals for four years before he is going to receive the needle, and my parents are still dead."
Deleon killed the Hawks in 2004 after feigning interest in buying their yacht. Prosecutors say he overpowered the couple on a test cruise, tied them to an anchor and tossed them into the Pacific Ocean as they begged for their lives.
According to prosecutors, Deleon and his then-wife Jennifer Henderson later scrubbed the boat clean with bleach wipes in Newport Harbor.
The Hawkses' bodies were never found.
Henderson was convicted in 2006 of murder and murder for financial gain in the Hawkses' deaths and was sentenced to two terms of life in prison without parole.
Three other men are also charged with the Hawkses' murders, including two allegedly on the boat at the time. They have pleaded not guilty.
Judge Frank F. Fasel will sentence Deleon on Jan. 16.
Friday, November 7, 2008
Sunday, November 2, 2008
Don't be Fooled with Flawed Research
British Researchers used flawed data to come to conclusion.
Self-reporting of alcohol use by pregnant women is the least scientific method of gathering accurate data. Using this unreliable data to make conclusions such as the British researchers did is poor research, on the verge of being unethical. This type of poor research, done in the name of science, is then taken up by the alcohol industry to promote use of alcohol. Here is the example on Wine Spectacular Hotline
Study OKs Some Wine During Pregnancy
British researchers find no signs of cognitive damage in children whose moms drank one to two glasses a week
The researchers pulled data on 12,495 3-year-old children from the U.K. Millennium Cohort Study, a project following the health and well-being of children born between 2000 and 2002 in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Families were randomly selected from child-benefit rolls (every mother is entitled to a stipend from the government after each birth).
During pregnancy, the women completed questionnaires on alcohol consumption, among other topics. The Millennium researchers then returned to the households three years later and administered a series of cognitive and behavioral tests on the children. For the current research, Kelly and her team separated the results of those tests according to the patterns of drinking in the mothers.
This study shows the unreliability of self-reporting by pregnant women.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynocology
Volume 198, Issue 4, Pages 407.e1-407.e5 (April 2008)
One hundred three pregnant women were included in the study. The women completed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) questionnaire, and a urine and hair sample was collected. The urine samples were used for determination of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate and the hair samples for EtG and fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEE).
Of the 26 who were found to have positive markers for consumption of alcohol, only three self reported drinking. Of the seven where the markers showed heavy alcohol users, only one self reported drinking and only at a light level.
Another study by the University of Boston of Public Health showed that markers indicating alcohol use in the past month were found in 71% of pregnant women who denied drinking.
I believe the peer reviewers did not do their academic duties when allowing the British study to be published.
Self-reporting of alcohol use by pregnant women is the least scientific method of gathering accurate data. Using this unreliable data to make conclusions such as the British researchers did is poor research, on the verge of being unethical. This type of poor research, done in the name of science, is then taken up by the alcohol industry to promote use of alcohol. Here is the example on Wine Spectacular Hotline
Study OKs Some Wine During Pregnancy
British researchers find no signs of cognitive damage in children whose moms drank one to two glasses a week
The researchers pulled data on 12,495 3-year-old children from the U.K. Millennium Cohort Study, a project following the health and well-being of children born between 2000 and 2002 in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Families were randomly selected from child-benefit rolls (every mother is entitled to a stipend from the government after each birth).
During pregnancy, the women completed questionnaires on alcohol consumption, among other topics. The Millennium researchers then returned to the households three years later and administered a series of cognitive and behavioral tests on the children. For the current research, Kelly and her team separated the results of those tests according to the patterns of drinking in the mothers.
This study shows the unreliability of self-reporting by pregnant women.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynocology
Volume 198, Issue 4, Pages 407.e1-407.e5 (April 2008)
One hundred three pregnant women were included in the study. The women completed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) questionnaire, and a urine and hair sample was collected. The urine samples were used for determination of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate and the hair samples for EtG and fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEE).
Of the 26 who were found to have positive markers for consumption of alcohol, only three self reported drinking. Of the seven where the markers showed heavy alcohol users, only one self reported drinking and only at a light level.
Another study by the University of Boston of Public Health showed that markers indicating alcohol use in the past month were found in 71% of pregnant women who denied drinking.
I believe the peer reviewers did not do their academic duties when allowing the British study to be published.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)